As Alan Jones continues to descend into his own PR hell, the role social media has played in sending him there cannot be denied.
We all know there have been brands, organisations, NFPs and individuals who have used social media as a means to reach their goals (Kony 2012 being a perfect example) and Destroy the Joint is not different.
What is different however is the movement’s reach, the speed with which it gained popularity and the impact it has had.
I’d like to take a pause, and take a moment away from the media frenzy and melodramatic progress of the Jones issue to explain the impact of social media in the campaign.
Late August 2012
Most people (except for Alan Jones) will see the irony behind the name “Destroy the Joint”. Taken straight from Jones’s statement about women destroying the joint (AKA female politicians destroying Australia) the movement began as a Twitter hashtag where people could express their thoughts and opinions about this statement.
The founder of Destroy the Joint, Jenna Price then created a Facebook page. A month later the page had over 10,000 fans. Five weeks after the page was created it gained a total of 14,684 fans.
Late September – October 2012
Destroy the Joint ramped up its campaign against sexism in the Australian society, when the media reported that Alan Jones told a Sydney University Liberal Club that Julia Gillard’s father died of shame because of the lies she told in Parliament.
After this comment,focusing on Alan Jones and making him accountable for his words and actions as part of a broader movement to challenge sexism.
The Facebook page of Destroy the Joint movement became the virtual “gathering” place of every person who wanted to be involved. It was used for:
- Sharing news related the campaign
- Asking people to share information that could be useful for the campaign – most importantly information about how to contact 2GB advertisers
- Delegating tasks to support the campaign – people were asked to contact advertisers and ask them to stop support for the radio show
- Managing people and setting the guidelines which they were to use to conduct themselves “”be calm, be kind, be courteous”
But that’s not all. Since the campaign was taking place on Facebook, the advertisers who pulled out from the show also informed their fans about the decision on Facebook, amplifying the message through comments and shares on their pages. Some examples include:
Twitter was a conversation starter and a discussion forum for anyone with a comment about the issue.
- Getting the attention of influencers and having them participate in conversations is another way social media can increase its reach and impact – which is exactly what happened when influential women in the media joined the conversation.
- Influencers such as Mia Freedman (28,794 followers), Catherine Deveny (23,429 followers) and Anne Summers (5,385 followers) had become involved in the conversation. Every tweet they re-tweeted, every response they made about the issue had the potential to be seen by their audience of thousands.
- Topsy was also used to estimate the activeness of the conversation around Alan Jones. After news about his latest comments hit on 29 September, Topsy estimated over 1000 mentions of the issue per day.
Apart from Destroy the Joint, other campaigns have sprung up against Alan Jones. Political science and international relations student Nic Lochner created Sack Alan Jones Facebook page which wields overwhelming popularity with more than 17,000 fans.
Over 114,000 people have signed the Change.org petition he also created asking 2GB and its advertisers to “cease association with Alan Jones” .
The considerable number of signatures provided evidence that a significant number of people were concerned about the offensive comments made by Jones and were willing to put that in writing.
Transition to mainstream media
When ABC’s AM show asked Destroy the Joint creator Jenna Price to speak about the campaign amongst Jones’s allegations that he was cyber bullied.
2GB also interviewed Jenna Price on 8 October to confront her about the public backlash inspired by Destroy the Joint. It was a clear sign that social media has done enough damage to be noticed.
What sets this campaign aside is its ability to target and to attract the right audience and to act as a focused and united front. You could almost call it a localised and targeted social media campaign – a campaign that managed to connect with the relevant influencers, inspired the public to act and brought the Alan Jones issue to the attention of media and government.
As the result of the pressure applied to advertisers through social media Macquarie Radio Network has suspended all advertising from Alan Jones’s show.
Mercedes Benz went as far as confiscating Alan Jones’s sponsored car to dissociate themselves from the radio host.
Awareness of the Alan Jones issue sky rocketed causing the public, the media, politicians to question and debate attitudes towards women in the Australian society.
I think this might be a glimpse of what we will see in the future – the public using social media as the weapon of choice when it comes to making their voices heard about particular issues.
However it remains to be seen if the power of the people in this case is stronger than the power of Alan Jones.